Would mentally ill schizophrenics that hear God tell them to kill or drink people's blood have a case suing?

Christian churches?


If I had been raised terrified by Bible stories and ritualistic drinking of Christ's


blood and eating HIS body wouldn't I have a case? What are they doing to


small kids minds with all those morbid, gory stories?Would mentally ill schizophrenics that hear God tell them to kill or drink people's blood have a case suing?
I think there should be a class action suit against churches in general and catholics


in particular. Too much emphasis in the bloody morbid details can make a weak mind


go over the brink when raised in a brainwashing environment.Would mentally ill schizophrenics that hear God tell them to kill or drink people's blood have a case suing?
psalm 96:5 which god would you like to sue ? there appear to be just as many of them as there are churches,congregations ,synagogues ,mosques and temples ?





matthew 16:18 / revelation 1;20 Messiah is saying He only has 1 church that He built,not peter, and that it has 7 divisions down through the ages with the last division,laodicea type individuals being the predominate type (revelation 3:14-22) and many of them keep Him standing outside the doors of His own church - verse 20





it is self evident by the behavior of some that even though they might claim to be christians that they do not believe what He taught ?





matthew 5:17 for example:think not that I came to do away with the law ? why do the majority of churches teach that He came to do away with the law ?
Who was horrified? It's 'Symbolic'. ';Do this in remembrance of Me'; and so we do.


I was an altar boy (10-13) and it taste the same, before and after it is Consecrated. Please don't tell on me. When it is Consecrated, it becomes a ';symbol'; of the blood that was be shed for all mankind. A symbol! Besides when we are at that young age and we receive our First Communion,


we only receive ';The Host'; a ';Symbol of the Body'; a wafer.


'Symbolic'. ';Do this in remembrance of Me'; and so we do.


Since, the N1H1 Virus has been around. We only receive the Host. Yet for us it is still the same as receiving both! 'Symbolic'


I do wonder what on His disciples minds at 'The Last Supper', knowing the miracles, that He had preformed, when they took that ';Cup?';


I sure they had some strange thoughts and did not understand what was all about to unfold. That He was the Sacrificial Lamb to be given up for all mankind. So that we may all be God's People and not just the chosen few. That includes you!


One thing more I would like to make clear. No one is forced to partake in the 'Sacrament of Communion'.





Atheist! I respect your right not to believe, and so, respect my right to believe. Please, keep your dumbs to yourself


A ? was asked and answered the best way I could. Respect that!


Thank You





PS - They can sue, but, they will have to prove that it was God they heard and not the satan, who would be the most likely suspect.
i doubt it .. you would have to prove that you are hearing the voice and how could you prove that you heard a voice and then you would get into the whole hearsay arguementand then you would have to prove that the voice you heard is gods and the you wold have to prove that god actually exists and it would go on and on and on .. so i would say no
Why schizophrenics? There's ';non-mentally ill'; individuals who do those types of things. Most schizophrenics don't hear God, anyway. They hear IMAGINARY people, which God is not.
Well you'd have to convince a jury of that....and most of them will be Christians who were exposed to the same terrifying stories and cannibalistic rituals.
No. Besides that schizophrenics are more likely to be the victims, rather than the perpetrators of violence.
It's how people twist things around and interpret them differently. I never was terrified by Bible stories. I loved them and still do.
YOU WOULD HAVE A CASE BASED ON YOUR ASSUMPTION........ What I mean is, mines is different from theirs and by theirs, you have a case.
No. Some people believe their neighbor's dogs talk to them. And they can't sue the neighbors for that.
can't prove which god was talking to them, etc etc





the whole concept is a mess, so no